India’s cement industry, after rebounding with 10–11% year-on-year growth in the March 2025 quarter, is poised for a more moderate performance in the June quarter due to the early onset of monsoon and a weak base from last year. Despite temporary tailwinds from government-led infrastructure spending, overall FY25 demand growth remained limited at 5–6%, the lowest since the pandemic-hit FY21. Price fluctuations, supply overhangs—especially in Southern and Eastern India—and declining profitability have intensified pressure on smaller players. With 45 million tonnes of acquisition deals already in play, the sector is witnessing an accelerating wave of consolidation, driven by diverging financial resilience.
Cement Demand Recovery Dented by Weather and Structural Constraints
India’s cement industry saw a resurgence in demand during the March 2025 quarter, with volumes growing 10–11% year-on-year. This recovery was largely underpinned by a strong rebound in infrastructure activity, which surged 11% year-on-year to reach Rs. 10.5 trillion, primarily due to a boost in central government capital expenditure following a period of stagnation in the first eight months of FY25.
However, the momentum may not sustain into the June quarter, as an early monsoon threatens to curtail construction activity. The latest report from credit rating agency India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) anticipates that the seasonal rains will dampen cement consumption growth, even as it remains in positive single digits, partly due to the subdued base effect from last year’s general election period.
Price Volatility and Realisation Trends: A Fragile Recovery
Cement manufacturers implemented multiple price hikes in April and May 2025, in an attempt to recover from a historic collapse in sales realisations seen last fiscal. These revisions helped deliver modest price growth year-on-year in Q1 FY26 after five consecutive quarters of decline. However, analysts caution that the gains have not been uniform across regions or players.
In fact, FY25 saw the sharpest annual decline in cement prices in two decades—down 5–6% year-on-year—driven by aggressive competition for market share amidst supply-demand imbalances. Southern India, which experienced the most acute supply glut, witnessed the steepest price erosion, followed by the Eastern region.
Despite the decline in average realisations, capacity utilisation among listed players remained high—around 90% in Q4 FY25—indicating tight competition. Yet, due to a sluggish first half, overall utilisation for the full year slipped to approximately 75%, compared to 77% in FY24.
Consolidation Accelerates as Tier 2 Players Struggle
FY25 proved especially challenging for smaller cement manufacturers. While the broader industry managed to achieve a modest 5–6% growth in sales volumes, Tier 2 players registered a contraction of 2–3%, further underlining their structural vulnerabilities.
Profitability disparities between large and small players widened as well. Tier 1 companies saw a decline of around 20% in median EBITDA per tonne, but Tier 2 entities suffered a precipitous fall of over 50%, leading to significant deterioration in their credit profiles.
This financial divergence is fueling an intensified phase of consolidation within the sector. Over the course of FY25, approximately 45 million tonnes of cement capacity changed hands through five major deals, more than half of which involved assets located in the oversupplied Southern region. Large players with resilient balance sheets continue to acquire smaller competitors, tightening their grip on market share and operational scale.
Outlook: Consolidation to Define Next Phase of Growth
While near-term demand could face monsoon-related challenges, the medium-term outlook for cement remains cautiously optimistic, supported by continued infrastructure expansion and housing demand. However, elevated competitive pressures, volatile input costs, and pricing challenges will continue to test industry margins.
In this evolving environment, the trend of consolidation is likely to deepen. The relative stability of large players’ financial metrics and their ability to absorb stressed assets will further tilt market power in their favour. Smaller players, saddled with eroded profitability and tighter liquidity, may increasingly become acquisition targets or exit the market altogether.
If the present dynamics persist, India’s cement sector could see a structural rebalancing, where fewer, more capital-efficient players dominate, potentially leading to a more rational pricing regime and disciplined capacity additions in the future.
Comments